Possession of Firearms in Drug Trafficking Crime lawyer Maryland, MD

Facing a federal charge for possession of a firearm in connection with a drug trafficking crime is a serious matter in Maryland. Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), the government must prove that you knowingly possessed a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense, and the penalties can include significant mandatory minimum prison terms that run consecutively to any sentence for the underlying drug charge. If you are under investigation or have been indicted in Maryland, you need representation that understands how the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland builds these cases. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. focuses a significant part of its federal practice on defending clients against § 924(c) charges. Reach the firm at (888) 437‑7747 to request a consultation. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

On this page

Federal Firearms and Drug Trafficking Prosecutions in Maryland

Federal firearms‑drug offenses are prosecuted in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, which holds proceedings in its Baltimore and Greenbelt divisions. The district encompasses the entire state, so whether the alleged conduct occurred in Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Howard County, or any other Maryland locality, the case will proceed in federal court under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland — supported by agencies such as the DEA, ATF, and FBI — routinely brings these charges as part of larger drug conspiracy or trafficking indictments. A federal conviction under § 924(c) carries mandatory minimum sentences that are served consecutively to any other sentence, and there is no parole in the federal system. The government must also prove a specific nexus between the firearm and the drug trafficking crime; mere presence of a weapon at the scene is not necessarily enough. Because the stakes are so high, early engagement with counsel is crucial.

In Maryland, federal drug‑firearm cases often involve allegations of possession of a firearm during a drug distribution operation, a drug‑trafficking conspiracy, or possession with intent to distribute controlled substances. The government may charge a single § 924(c) count or, if more than one firearm was involved, multiple counts that can lead to consecutive 25‑year mandatory minimums for a second or subsequent conviction. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. is experienced in scrutinizing the government’s evidence on each element — from whether the firearm was “used or carried” during and in relation to, or “possessed in furtherance of,” a drug trafficking crime, to whether the underlying drug offense is adequately proven. The firm’s attorneys draw on extensive collective experience to challenge the admissibility of evidence, cross‑examine cooperating witnesses, and negotiate with federal prosecutors where it serves the client’s interest.

How Mr. Sris and His Of Counsel Handle Federal Firearms-Drug Cases

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys approach every § 924(c) case with a thorough evaluation of the government’s theory. They examine the search warrant and the method of discovery of the firearm — did law enforcement obtain a valid warrant, was there probable cause, and were any statements obtained in violation of Miranda? The defense team also analyzes whether the firearm had any actual connection to the alleged drug crime. A weapon found in a residence where drugs are also kept does not automatically satisfy the “in furtherance” requirement; the government must show more than a coincidental presence. The firm’s attorneys may challenge constructive‑possession arguments, file motions to suppress, and, where appropriate, seek to sever the firearm count from the drug charges if prejudice exists. Throughout the process, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work toward the most favorable outcome for the client — whether that is dismissal of the gun count, a favorable plea resolution that avoids a stacking mandatory minimum, or a not‑guilty verdict at trial. Because federal mandatory minimums are severe, a detailed factual and legal analysis at the earliest stage can materially affect the client’s exposure.

When a client retains the firm, the legal team promptly initiates discovery review, communicates with the assigned Assistant U.S. Attorney, and analyzes the advisory sentencing guidelines range. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive combined legal experience to bear in constructing a defense that accounts for the unique procedural rules of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. They understand how the local federal bench applies the sentencing guidelines and how prosecutors in the Maryland U.S. Attorney’s Office typically negotiate. The firm’s representation covers everything from initial appearance and detention hearing through trial and, if necessary, appeal. Results may vary.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor who has practiced criminal law since 1997. He is admitted before the state and federal courts of Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, and he regularly appears in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland on federal criminal matters. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova).

The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys are experienced federal practitioners who contract directly with Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. They bring additional background in criminal defense, trial practice, and former prosecutorial experience that enhances the firm’s ability to challenge the government’s case on both factual and legal grounds. Together, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work collaboratively to ensure each client receives focused, well‑prepared representation. The firm’s Rockville, Maryland, location serves clients throughout the state, and consultations are available by appointment. Reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437‑7747.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the penalties for possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime in Maryland?

Federal law imposes mandatory minimum prison sentences for possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and the term must be served consecutively to any other sentence. A first‑time § 924(c) conviction carries a mandatory minimum that varies depending on how the firearm was used (possessed, brandished, or discharged), and for a second or subsequent conviction the mandatory minimum increases significantly. There is no parole in the federal system, and the advisory sentencing guidelines also influence the ultimate sentence. Because the consequences are severe, anyone facing a § 924(c) charge should consult federal defense counsel immediately.

Do I need a federal criminal lawyer for a § 924(c) charge in Maryland?

Yes, retaining a federal criminal defense attorney as soon as possible is critical when you are facing a § 924(c) charge. Federal practice differs from state court: the Federal Rules of Evidence, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines govern every phase, and pretrial detention standards are distinct. An experienced federal defense attorney can evaluate the sufficiency of the government’s evidence, identify procedural violations, and negotiate with federal prosecutors. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. offers representation to individuals charged in the District of Maryland; call (888) 437‑7747 to request a consultation.

What are common defenses to a federal firearms‑in‑drug‑trafficking charge?

Possible defenses include challenging the alleged nexus between the firearm and the drug trafficking crime, contesting constructive possession, seeking suppression of evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search, and undermining the credibility of cooperating witnesses. The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the firearm was possessed “in furtherance of” the drug crime — mere proximity is insufficient. An experienced defense team will examine every element and may argue that the gun was unrelated to any drug activity. Each case is fact‑specific, and the firm works to develop the strong $1 based on the circumstances. Results may vary.

Where are federal firearms‑drug cases prosecuted in Maryland?

All federal prosecutions for § 924(c) violations in Maryland take place in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. The court has two primary locations: the Edward A. Garmatz Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Baltimore, and the U.S. Courthouse in Greenbelt. Depending on where the alleged offense occurred, the case may be assigned to the Northern Division (Baltimore) or the Southern Division (Greenbelt). Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. Appears regularly before both divisions and is familiar with the local practices and judicial expectations in each.

How do I schedule a consultation with a federal defense attorney in Maryland?

To discuss your situation with a federal defense attorney, call Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437‑7747. Consultations are available by appointment, and the firm can meet with clients at its Rockville, Maryland, location or by phone. The legal team will listen to the facts, explain the charges, and discuss potential defense strategies. Because early intervention can affect the direction of a federal investigation, it is advisable to reach out as soon as you become aware of a potential charge. The firm’s staff is available to take your call and schedule a time that works for you.

Clients across Maryland also rely on the firm for federal defense in neighboring counties, including:

For more information on federal firearms‑drug trafficking law, consult these primary legal resources:

U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual
18 U.S.C. § 924(c) — possession of firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking crime

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.